-
1 reverse inequality
English-russian dctionary of contemporary Economics > reverse inequality
-
2 reverse inequality
Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > reverse inequality
-
3 reverse inequality
Математика: обратное неравенство -
4 reverse inequality
мат. -
5 inequality
1) неравенство, неравность2) неровность (поверхности); неодинаковость3) матем. неравенство -
6 inequality
nнеравенство; разница
- feasible inequality
- fundamental inequality
- opposite inequality
- reverse inequality
- strict inequality
- weak inequality
- inequality in rates of profitEnglish-russian dctionary of contemporary Economics > inequality
-
7 обратное неравенство
Mathematics: inverse inequality, opposite inequality, reverse inequality, converse inequalityУниверсальный русско-английский словарь > обратное неравенство
-
8 обратное неравенство
Большой англо-русский и русско-английский словарь > обратное неравенство
-
9 обратное неравенство
inverse inequality мат., opposite inequality, reverse inequalityРусско-английский научно-технический словарь Масловского > обратное неравенство
-
10 discriminación
f.1 discrimination, bias, prejudice.2 discrimination, nose, eye, keenness.* * *1 discrimination\discriminación racial racial discrimination* * *noun f.* * *SF discrimination ( contra against)discriminación positiva — positive discrimination, affirmative action (EEUU)
* * *femenino discrimination* * *Ex. She was chairperson of the Task Force that in 1972 wrote a monumental report about discrimination against women in the library profession.----* capacidad de discriminación = discriminating power.* discriminación de género = gender discrimination.* discriminación étnica = ethnic discrimination.* discriminación por razones de edad = ageism [agism].* discriminación positiva = affirmative action, positive discrimination.* discriminación racial = racial injustice, racial discrimination, colour bar.* discriminación salarial = pay discrimination, pay inequality, wage discrimination, salary discrimination.* discriminación sexual = sexual discrimination, sex discrimination, gender discrimination.* método del Valor de Discriminación (DV) = Discrimination Value model (DV).* poder de discriminación = discretion.* ser objeto de discriminación = suffer + discrimination.* validez de discriminación = discriminant validity.* * *femenino discrimination* * *Ex: She was chairperson of the Task Force that in 1972 wrote a monumental report about discrimination against women in the library profession.
* capacidad de discriminación = discriminating power.* discriminación de género = gender discrimination.* discriminación étnica = ethnic discrimination.* discriminación por razones de edad = ageism [agism].* discriminación positiva = affirmative action, positive discrimination.* discriminación racial = racial injustice, racial discrimination, colour bar.* discriminación salarial = pay discrimination, pay inequality, wage discrimination, salary discrimination.* discriminación sexual = sexual discrimination, sex discrimination, gender discrimination.* método del Valor de Discriminación (DV) = Discrimination Value model (DV).* poder de discriminación = discretion.* ser objeto de discriminación = suffer + discrimination.* validez de discriminación = discriminant validity.* * *discriminationdiscriminación CONTRA algn/algo discrimination AGAINST sb/sthhan sido objeto de discriminación they have been the object of discriminationun caso de discriminación de género/una discriminación de género a case of sex discriminationCompuestos:discrimination in the work placedisability discriminationage discrimination, ageismsex discriminationsex discriminationpositive discrimination● discriminación racial/sexualracial/sexual discrimination* * *
discriminación sustantivo femenino
discrimination
discriminación sustantivo femenino discrimination
discriminación positiva, reverse discrimination
' discriminación' also found in these entries:
Spanish:
sexual
English:
affirmative
- blatant
- colour bar
- discrimination
- eradicate
- outrage
- reverse discrimination
- taste
- ageism
- sex
* * *discriminationdiscriminación positiva positive discrimination;discriminación racial racial discrimination;discriminación sexual sex o sexual discrimination* * *f discrimination* * ** * *discriminación n discrimination -
11 graph
1) граф2) график || строить график3) диаграмма || чертить диаграмму•- alternating composition graph - arbitrarily transversable graph - derived graph - doubly connected graph - doubly transitive graph - fully connected graph - locally countable graph - locally finite graph - locally restricted graph - log-log graph - partially labeled graph - partially orderable graph - progressively finite graph - regressively finite graph - strictly weak graph - strongly orientable graph - strongly regular graph - strongly rigid graph - strongly singular graph - strongly smooth graph - totally inductive graph - triangleless graph - triply transitive graph - uniquely intersectable graph - uniquely representable graph - weakly disconnected graph -
12 sense
1) смысл; значение4) ощущение || ощущать5) разум6) чувство || чувствовать7) мор. знак направления•in the sense of — в смысле; в том смысле, что
-
13 asperitas
I.Lit.:B.saxorum asperitates,
Cic. N. D. 2, 39, 98:asperitas viarum,
id. Phil. 9, 1, 2:locorum,
Sall. J. 75, 2:angustiae locorumque asperitas,
Liv. 32, 12 fin.; 43, 21; 44, 5 al.:linguae,
Plin. 11, 37, 65, § 172:ventris,
id. 11, 37, 79, § 201:squamarum,
Gell. 2, 6:faucium,
Plin. 30, 4, 11, § 32:animi asperitas seu potius animae,
hoarseness, id. 22, 24, 51, § 111:ob asperitatem hiemis,
roughness, severity, Tac. A. 4, 56:asperitas frigorum abest,
id. Agr. 12:densaque cedit Frigoris asperitas,
Ov. F. 4, 88 al.:asperitas luti,
dryness, barrenness of the clay, Vitr. 2, 3.—Of raised work (cf. 1. asper, I., and exaspero):vasa anaglypta in asperitatemque excisa,
with figures in basrelief, Plin. 33, 11, 49, § 139.—Transf.1.Of taste, harshness, sharpness, acidity, tartness:2. 3.vini,
Plin. 14, 19, 24, § 120:pomi,
id. 12, 10, 21, § 38:aceti,
id. 9, 35, 58, § 120:aquarum,
the brackish taste of water, id. 12, 9, 20, § 37 al. —Of sight, inequality, contrast:II.cum aspectus ejus scaenae propter asperitatem eblandiretur omnium visus,
on account of the contrast of light and shade, Vitr. 7, 5:intercolumniorum,
id. 3, 3.—Trop.A.Of moral qualities, roughness, harshness, severity, fierceness, asperity:B.si quis eā asperitate est et immanitate naturae, congressus ut hominum fugiat atque oderit, etc.,
Cic. Lael. 23, 87:avunculi,
Nep. Att. 5, 1:patris,
Ov. M. 9, 752:artibus ingenuis Pectora mollescunt, asperitasque fugit,
id. P. 1, 6, 8:asperitatis et invidiae corrector,
Hor. Ep. 2, 1, 129.—Of a rigid, austere manner of life: quam illorum (Stoicorum) tristitiam atque asperitatem fugiens Panaetius nec acerbitatem sententiarum nec disserendi spinas probavit, Cic. Fin. 4, 28, 79; cf. 1. asper, II. A.—And of rudeness in external appearance, opp. to a polished, cultivated bearing:asperitas agrestis,
Hor. Ep. 1, 18, 6.—Of things, adversity, reverse of fortune, trouble, severity, difficulty (cf. 1. asper, II. B., and acerbitas):in his vel asperitatibus rerum vel angustiis temporis obsequar studiis nostris,
Cic. de Or. 1, 1, 3:asperitas belli,
Sall. J. 29, 1:remedii,
Tac. A. 1, 44.—Of style, roughness, harshness, trachutês (cf. 1. asper, II. B.):oratio in quā asperitas contentionis oratoris ipsius humanitate conditur,
Cic. de Or. 2, 53, 212. judicialis asperitas, id. ib. 2, 15, 64; so Quint. 1, 8, 11; 10, 5, 14 (cf. id. 11, 3, 23):verborum,
Ov. M. 14, 526. -
14 Knowledge
It is indeed an opinion strangely prevailing amongst men, that houses, mountains, rivers, and, in a word, all sensible objects, have an existence, natural or real, distinct from their being perceived by the understanding. But, with how great an assurance and acquiescence soever this principle may be entertained in the world, yet whoever shall find in his heart to call it into question may, if I mistake not, perceive it to involve a manifest contradiction. For, what are the forementioned objects but things we perceive by sense? and what do we perceive besides our own ideas or sensations? and is it not plainly repugnant that any one of these, or any combination of them, should exist unperceived? (Berkeley, 1996, Pt. I, No. 4, p. 25)It seems to me that the only objects of the abstract sciences or of demonstration are quantity and number, and that all attempts to extend this more perfect species of knowledge beyond these bounds are mere sophistry and illusion. As the component parts of quantity and number are entirely similar, their relations become intricate and involved; and nothing can be more curious, as well as useful, than to trace, by a variety of mediums, their equality or inequality, through their different appearances.But as all other ideas are clearly distinct and different from each other, we can never advance farther, by our utmost scrutiny, than to observe this diversity, and, by an obvious reflection, pronounce one thing not to be another. Or if there be any difficulty in these decisions, it proceeds entirely from the undeterminate meaning of words, which is corrected by juster definitions. That the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the squares of the other two sides cannot be known, let the terms be ever so exactly defined, without a train of reasoning and enquiry. But to convince us of this proposition, that where there is no property, there can be no injustice, it is only necessary to define the terms, and explain injustice to be a violation of property. This proposition is, indeed, nothing but a more imperfect definition. It is the same case with all those pretended syllogistical reasonings, which may be found in every other branch of learning, except the sciences of quantity and number; and these may safely, I think, be pronounced the only proper objects of knowledge and demonstration. (Hume, 1975, Sec. 12, Pt. 3, pp. 163-165)Our knowledge springs from two fundamental sources of the mind; the first is the capacity of receiving representations (the ability to receive impressions), the second is the power to know an object through these representations (spontaneity in the production of concepts).Through the first, an object is given to us; through the second, the object is thought in relation to that representation.... Intuition and concepts constitute, therefore, the elements of all our knowledge, so that neither concepts without intuition in some way corresponding to them, nor intuition without concepts, can yield knowledge. Both may be either pure or empirical.... Pure intuitions or pure concepts are possible only a priori; empirical intuitions and empirical concepts only a posteriori. If the receptivity of our mind, its power of receiving representations in so far as it is in any way affected, is to be called "sensibility," then the mind's power of producing representations from itself, the spontaneity of knowledge, should be called "understanding." Our nature is so constituted that our intuitions can never be other than sensible; that is, it contains only the mode in which we are affected by objects. The faculty, on the other hand, which enables us to think the object of sensible intuition is the understanding.... Without sensibility, no object would be given to us; without understanding, no object would be thought. Thoughts without content are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind. It is therefore just as necessary to make our concepts sensible, that is, to add the object to them in intuition, as to make our intuitions intelligible, that is to bring them under concepts. These two powers or capacities cannot exchange their functions. The understanding can intuit nothing, the senses can think nothing. Only through their union can knowledge arise. (Kant, 1933, Sec. 1, Pt. 2, B74-75 [p. 92])Metaphysics, as a natural disposition of Reason is real, but it is also, in itself, dialectical and deceptive.... Hence to attempt to draw our principles from it, and in their employment to follow this natural but none the less fallacious illusion can never produce science, but only an empty dialectical art, in which one school may indeed outdo the other, but none can ever attain a justifiable and lasting success. In order that, as a science, it may lay claim not merely to deceptive persuasion, but to insight and conviction, a Critique of Reason must exhibit in a complete system the whole stock of conceptions a priori, arranged according to their different sources-the Sensibility, the understanding, and the Reason; it must present a complete table of these conceptions, together with their analysis and all that can be deduced from them, but more especially the possibility of synthetic knowledge a priori by means of their deduction, the principles of its use, and finally, its boundaries....This much is certain: he who has once tried criticism will be sickened for ever of all the dogmatic trash he was compelled to content himself with before, because his Reason, requiring something, could find nothing better for its occupation. Criticism stands to the ordinary school metaphysics exactly in the same relation as chemistry to alchemy, or as astron omy to fortune-telling astrology. I guarantee that no one who has comprehended and thought out the conclusions of criticism, even in these Prolegomena, will ever return to the old sophistical pseudo-science. He will rather look forward with a kind of pleasure to a metaphysics, certainly now within his power, which requires no more preparatory discoveries, and which alone can procure for reason permanent satisfaction. (Kant, 1891, pp. 115-116)Knowledge is only real and can only be set forth fully in the form of science, in the form of system. Further, a so-called fundamental proposition or first principle of philosophy, even if it is true, it is yet none the less false, just because and in so far as it is merely a fundamental proposition, merely a first principle. It is for that reason easily refuted. The refutation consists in bringing out its defective character; and it is defective because it is merely the universal, merely a principle, the beginning. If the refutation is complete and thorough, it is derived and developed from the nature of the principle itself, and not accomplished by bringing in from elsewhere other counter-assurances and chance fancies. It would be strictly the development of the principle, and thus the completion of its deficiency, were it not that it misunderstands its own purport by taking account solely of the negative aspect of what it seeks to do, and is not conscious of the positive character of its process and result. The really positive working out of the beginning is at the same time just as much the very reverse: it is a negative attitude towards the principle we start from. Negative, that is to say, in its one-sided form, which consists in being primarily immediate, a mere purpose. It may therefore be regarded as a refutation of what constitutes the basis of the system; but more correctly it should be looked at as a demonstration that the basis or principle of the system is in point of fact merely its beginning. (Hegel, 1910, pp. 21-22)Knowledge, action, and evaluation are essentially connected. The primary and pervasive significance of knowledge lies in its guidance of action: knowing is for the sake of doing. And action, obviously, is rooted in evaluation. For a being which did not assign comparative values, deliberate action would be pointless; and for one which did not know, it would be impossible. Conversely, only an active being could have knowledge, and only such a being could assign values to anything beyond his own feelings. A creature which did not enter into the process of reality to alter in some part the future content of it, could apprehend a world only in the sense of intuitive or esthetic contemplation; and such contemplation would not possess the significance of knowledge but only that of enjoying and suffering. (Lewis, 1946, p. 1)"Evolutionary epistemology" is a branch of scholarship that applies the evolutionary perspective to an understanding of how knowledge develops. Knowledge always involves getting information. The most primitive way of acquiring it is through the sense of touch: amoebas and other simple organisms know what happens around them only if they can feel it with their "skins." The knowledge such an organism can have is strictly about what is in its immediate vicinity. After a huge jump in evolution, organisms learned to find out what was going on at a distance from them, without having to actually feel the environment. This jump involved the development of sense organs for processing information that was farther away. For a long time, the most important sources of knowledge were the nose, the eyes, and the ears. The next big advance occurred when organisms developed memory. Now information no longer needed to be present at all, and the animal could recall events and outcomes that happened in the past. Each one of these steps in the evolution of knowledge added important survival advantages to the species that was equipped to use it.Then, with the appearance in evolution of humans, an entirely new way of acquiring information developed. Up to this point, the processing of information was entirely intrasomatic.... But when speech appeared (and even more powerfully with the invention of writing), information processing became extrasomatic. After that point knowledge did not have to be stored in the genes, or in the memory traces of the brain; it could be passed on from one person to another through words, or it could be written down and stored on a permanent substance like stone, paper, or silicon chips-in any case, outside the fragile and impermanent nervous system. (Csikszentmihalyi, 1993, pp. 56-57)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Knowledge
См. также в других словарях:
Inequality — In mathematics, an inequality is a statement about the relative size or order of two objects, or about whether they are the same or not (See also: equality) *The notation a < b means that a is less than b . *The notation a > b means that a is… … Wikipedia
Inequality (mathematics) — Not to be confused with Inequation. Less than and Greater than redirect here. For the use of the < and > signs as punctuation, see Bracket. More than redirects here. For the UK insurance brand, see RSA Insurance Group. The feasible regions… … Wikipedia
Reverse discrimination — Part of a series on Discrimination General forms … Wikipedia
Milman's reverse Brunn-Minkowski inequality — In mathematics, Milman s reverse Brunn Minkowski inequality is a result due to Vitali Milman that provides a reverse inequality to the famous Brunn Minkowski inequality for convex bodies in n dimensional Euclidean space R n . At first sight, such … Wikipedia
Milman's reverse Brunn–Minkowski inequality — In mathematics, Milman s reverse Brunn Minkowski inequality is a result due to Vitali Milman that provides a reverse inequality to the famous Brunn Minkowski inequality for convex bodies in n dimensional Euclidean space Rn. At first sight, such a … Wikipedia
Hölder's inequality — In mathematical analysis Hölder s inequality, named after Otto Hölder, is a fundamental inequality between integrals and an indispensable tool for the study of Lp spaces. Let (S, Σ, μ) be a measure space and let 1 ≤ p, q ≤ ∞ with… … Wikipedia
Differential variational inequality — In mathematics, a differential variational inequality (DVI) is a dynamical system that incorporates ordinary differential equations and variational inequalities or complementarity problems. DVIs are useful for representing models involving both… … Wikipedia
Prékopa-Leindler inequality — In mathematics, the Prékopa Leindler inequality is an integral inequality closely related to the reverse Young s inequality, the Brunn Minkowski inequality and a number of other important and classical inequalities in analysis. The result is… … Wikipedia
Jackson's inequality — In approximation theory, Jackson s inequality is an inequality (proved by Dunham Jackson) between the value of function s best approximation by polynomials and the modulus of continuity of its derivatives. Here is one of the simple cases… … Wikipedia
Muckenhoupt weights — In mathematics, the class of Muckenhoupt weights Ap consists of those weights ω for which the Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator is bounded on Lp(dω). Specifically, we consider functions f on and their associated maximal functions M(f) defined as… … Wikipedia
Rank (linear algebra) — The column rank of a matrix A is the maximum number of linearly independent column vectors of A. The row rank of a matrix A is the maximum number of linearly independent row vectors of A. Equivalently, the column rank of A is the dimension of the … Wikipedia
